rights and entitlement30 Jun 2003
Put simply, modern liberalism is based on a lie which is propped up by theft.
So what are rights? How do we distinguish between true human rights, and the parasitic privileges of a wealthy culture? In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote,
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Note the essentially limited nature of those rights. True rights delineate opportunities, not outcomes. Health, wealth, and happiness are not rights; the pursuit of them is. Jefferson tells us that we have the right to struggle, nothing more. Compare this with the liberal laundry list of rights, most of which define outcomes, not opportunities.
Wow – “a lie which is propped up by theft”. Harsh words! The failing in Rich’s logic is that “rights” are a social construction to begin with. We have as many or as few rights as we, as a society, decide to have. Pretty simple!
I think some analysis, also, of the quote from the Declaration of Independence is called for. “We hold these truths to be self-evident”. Ponder the first two words, “We hold”. The Bill of Rights lays the foundation for rights that were chosen at the time, by way of reasoning and logic, to be inalienable and, as the religious climate of the time dictated, God-given. The Bill of Rights is the framework for our society’s morality. It’s a floor, not a ceiling. Rich tells us to “note the essentially limited nature of those rights”. Sorry, Rich, I missed that part.
Short, but sweet. It’s pretty hard to interpret this as anything but what it says: a right not being listed in the Constitution does not mean that it does not exist, or cannot exist.