grammar Ford

Weird ellipses in a quote of Ford from this Tennessean article:

“I was there,” the Memphis Democrat said. “I like football, and I like girls. I don’t have … no apologies for that.”

WMCTV quotes him as:

“I was there,” he said. “I like football, and I like girls. I have no apologies for that.”

So which is it? Bad grammar or good grammar?

UPDATE:

After watching this video, it’s clear he just corrected himself because he realized he was about to say “I don’t have any apologies”, which is a little more awkward than “I have no apologies”. I blame the Tennesseean for using ellipses to reflect his change mid-stream but including both negatives, but as Tari said in the comments, it’s difficult to deal with while still providing a verbatim transcription of his quote.

I won’t … not stay on top of this breaking political scandal as the developments .. uh, develop.


Comments

I’d say the question should be southern grammar or good grammar? :)

Ford continually says “between you and I” and makes other common grammar mistakes, but I don’t think that this one’s a matter of grammar so much as style. When he starts talking like a Ford, the southern colloquialisms come out. He’s being “folksy.”

But as I’ve written, you’d think with his elite education he wouldn’t make such egregious mistakes.

You know, I think this might just be that someone tried using ellipses to represent a pause–in this case, the kind of pause that you make when you change the structure of your sentence part of the way through. He started to say something like, “I don’t have any apologies for that” or “I don’t have to apologize for that” and then changed his mind and said, “No apologies for that” (with the “I have” elided, which is a common enough construction in not-totally-formal speech). I really doubt he said, “I don’t have no” etc. I think one source tried to transcribe what he said exactly, and the other just picked the construction he seemed to be aiming at by the end of his utterance.

We need to invent a punctuation mark for “speaker aborts previous sentence construction and takes up a new one.” I really think it’s the ellipses, which–not to be too prescriptive–are customarily used to indicate omission, that are the culprit here.

You’re exactly right.. I think you posted this comment concurrent with my update.. Check out the video..

Ned WilliamsOctober 25, 2006 at 18:55 · reply

I think the ellipsis is legitimate, though an em dash would probably have been more appropriate; no harm done by The Tennessean in my view. That being said, I believe that WMCTV has no business editing Ford’s statement for him. I don’t see media outlets editing Dubya’s statements “to make meaning clearer.”

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment