cheekwood

Amanda and I have made somewhat of a tradition of going out to Cheekwood every Memorial Day to celebrate our anniversary. We usually meander through the gardens, enjoying the sun, suffering the heat, and taking in the glorious smell of a well-manicured garden. This year we took a slight detour down the “woodland sculpture” trail, which we had never really explored before, because it starts off with some pretty boring metalwork stuff. But the trail is a lot longer than we realized, and we made some .. interesting discoveries.

Among them was a giant bunny I spotted in the distance. “Cool, a giant bunny”, I thought. So, we went to check it out, and when we arrived:

img_1416

“Oh, a giant bunny woman. Cool.”, we thought. Then we meandered around to the other end:

img_1420

“Oh, a giant .. bunny woman .. vagina. Cool?”, we thought. Apparently it’s the work of Sophie Ryder. It’s a neat piece, but I can’t shake the association with the obvious problem with a half-bunny half-woman with well-defined genitals and breasts. Amanda thinks that this piece and the half-spaniel half-women sculptures out front are evidence that the Cheekwood’s art director is a furry. Maybe so. Either way, I am surprised that a fairly family-oriented place in Nashville would allow the display of genitals, even if sculpted from wire. I think it’s awesome, myself.

Then, we encountered this, which I think is amazing:

img_1396

I bet that 95% of the patrons of the park walk right by this piece without even realizing it’s there. The thought process we encountered was:

“Wow, that tree looks sorta like it has legs.. and a torso.. and arms. Hm, actually, that tree looks just like Jesus Christ on the cross. Wow, how weird!”

“Wait.. that can’t be natural – it’s too uncanny. This was clearly carved. Man, how did they carve a figure of Jesus Christ in a tree, while allowing the bark to continue to grow around it without killing it!”

It’s around this point that logic kicks in, and Amanda knocked on it: “Oh. It’s Bronze”

It’s a beautifully subtle work of art. I love it.


Comments

Uh, wow. To the rabbit-thing.

That aside, Cheekwood seems pretty cool! I’d always heard about it but never knew what it was all about.

KaeboraMay 15, 2009 at 06:50 · reply

Sophie Ryder has no active participation or acknowledgment in the furry fandom actually. Furries are just enthusiasts for modern cartoonist anthro-culture (movies, comics, etc) which is fairly limited. There are hundreds of thousands of artists through history with a fascination with anthropomorphic art. The fact that the piece is anatomically correct is nothing new or unusual in classical sculpture. I really wish I could walk around this piece to get a better understanding of what she is trying to convey. If it’s like most of Sophie’s work, it should hold an emotional meaning, tied to the surrounding environment. I have a strong feeling that the choice of using a rabbit may have to do with fertility or a predator’s prey, which are common themes associated with rabbits.

u can totallly tell thats fake duhh

Farhah_hisamuddinMarch 18, 2012 at 12:37 · reply

OMG!!! Where did you found this picture?? It’s really creapy!!

AnonymousMay 24, 2012 at 03:31 · reply

That rabbit could have been a decayed human wrapped in foliage. Maybe it was mummified. Someone should report that to the police.

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment