hazel-eyed man opines

For the purposes of sparing my twitter followers that don’t care, relocating discussion here. So far:

cwage: ok this story is awesome: http://www.wsmv.com/news/17008504/detail.html
cwage: why was it important to the story that he was homeless, though.. sounds to me like his defining characteristics were “drunk” + “crazy”
pwnicholson: @cwage I agree the story probably emphasized his homelessness, but it is normal practice to say “John Smith of Antioch” so it fits to me.
cwage: @pwnicholson “John Smith of Antioch” is an identity. “homeless man” is not
pwnicholson: @cwage Their local headline section: #1 is “Clarksville man” #3 is “Homeless man”. Not saying there isn’t bias, just not sure this is it

I left a comment on the story as well. This is not a new argument – institutional bias in media coverage does exist. Witness the age-old argument of how often you see “A black youth” versus “A white youth”, etc. In a news story, ideally you’d identify characteristics that are either relevant to the story or serve as a general cue for the subject’s identity or tie in why it’s even being reported. “John Smith of Antioch” == an identity. “Clarksville man” == “oh, he was from Clarksville, which is near here. that’s why WSMV is reporting it”. “homeless man” is not an identity, nor was it relevant to the fact that he got drunk and stole a trolley. “Drunk man”, yes. “Crazy dude”, yes.

Anyways, wanted to spare the twitterers the discussion. Feel free to continue arguing below! Or not.


Comments

Paul NicholsonJuly 28, 2008 at 16:06 · reply

I hear ya man. I’m just saying i think WSMV is doing this half out of habit trying to very loosely and sloppily follow AP style. I have no doubt that they also thought they were following style guidelines and avoiding redundancy by using “homeless” to imply “crazy”. I was just trying to give them a little credit. No doubt that there is bias and full support of stereotypes. Not just for the homeless but for people that live in the projects or are found anywhere near La Fayette, Antioch, or even East Nashville for that matter.

Oh, I agree.. I don’t think it’s like some conspiracy because there’s a homeless-hatah on WSMV’s staff or something.. But the media has a ton of power and thus they have a responsibility not to propogate bias like that, whether it’s intentional, or a subconscious/institutionalized thing, and I have a responsibility to call them on it when I see it..

jim voorhiesJuly 30, 2008 at 19:47 · reply

i’m sure he must have been a veteran so I wonder why they didn’t call him a homeless vet so we’d all know for sure he was crazy.

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment