WTN

This past weekend I borrowed my dad’s van to haul some shit, and as usual, his radio was pegged to WTN. And, as usual, it was seconds before my blood was boiling with anger. I am a pretty laidback guy, but it was only a small amount of time before I felt like punching something. And the sad part is, most of it was actually an ABC segment, not even on WTN itself.

The story (on ABC) was about the increasing “backlash” against anti-illegal immigration – the myriad farms and industries that are realizing how dependent they are on illegal immigration. The story focused on dairy farms in Wisconsin, and how local law enforcement is even tolerating illegal immigrants – with some local sheriffs going as far as to counsel new immigrants on how to avoid being picked up.

Why is this infuriating? It’s infuriating because it’s evidence that both sides of this debate on immigration are hopelessly wrong. There’s the obviously wrongheaded, reactionary and xenophobic anti-immigrant sentiment, of course. But this piece was representative of the “other” side of the debate, which is equally stupid. The gist of the argument, including how it was presented in the ABC piece, is that we actually need illegal immigrants, because they are the backbone of so many industries. They are hard-working, “honest”, and they do jobs that “regular Americans” just don’t want to do. The piece even had a quote from some sheriff or farmer: “I used to think of Mexicans as lazy, but now I know that they are hard-working, honest people who just want to do jobs we don’t want to.” Well, shit, aren’t you just the most enlightened motherfucker in the world?

Do you see how disturbing the racism lurking under the surface here is? Aside from the fact that we’re apparently comfortable dismissing an entire class of immigrants from south of the border as some sort of subhuman slave species, there’s the elephant in the room: illegal immigrants don’t do jobs we “don’t want to do” because they’re just really happy to do it. They do them because they are being exploited voraciously by industries taking advantage of the fact that they are here illegally. They have no labor rights or recourse to the law. They have no protection from minimum wage legislation. They may not be a subhuman slave species, but they are certainly a lower, “cheaper” class of labor.

So, of course the local law enforcement is willing to cooperate to tolerate illegal immigration. It’s a massive cashcow that subsists on the exploitation of a lower class of people. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. That’s why we aren’t going to see any meaningful legislation on illegal immigration any time soon. And it’s also why local law enforcement will never organize to actually put a dent in it. Do things like this 287(g) act actually threaten to stem the tide of illegal immigration? Of course not. It serves only to maintain an acceptable level of fear to terrorize that population, lest they become comfortable and secure. If they become comfortable and secure, they stop being cheap.

So anyways, after that piece ended, a car-talk show came on, AMURICA’S CAR TALK – I guess to differentiate them from those commie lattie-sipping liberals Click & Clack up in Taxachusetts – which consisted of like maybe 3 actual calls and then a 15 minute commercial for Mack tools. The commercials in between this commercial, though, were equally infuriating – one promo spot for WTN itself was one of those “when NEWS STRIKES, we’re there!!” with random clips of “news”, including this gem: “… intercepted 50 million mexicans, attempting to cross the border…”

I’m sorry, what? 50 million? Where do they get this? Was it just a clip they snipped completely ouf of context? Or did they just have some guy in a booth record that for the hell of it? With this sort of bizarre propaganda, is it any wonder this entire area is whipped into a frenzy about the ‘cans tryin to steal our jobs? Fucked up.


Comments

jacquelineJuly 03, 2007 at 17:04 · reply

I think you are really getting at something that has bothered me about all this discussion as well. Your analysis is pretty right on.

Additionally, something that I think is generally overlooked is the class-ist nature of the discussion. We have all heard the statistics that illegal immigration raises the wages of natives. Etc. Etc. “They do the jobs we don’t want to do”. Yeah and who is “we” might I ask? Don’t “we” sound very middle class right about now? There is a job displacement. There have been studies(merely quoted to me by my econ friends) that you can look at levels across the board OR you can divide it up. And it shows that people with no high school degrees are extremely negatively effected by this basically slave labor.

Exactly – the sentiment that jobs are being “stolen” is real and shouldn’t be dismissed, but rather than bowing to knee-jerk xenophobia, it needs to be clear that it is rooted in a real economic phenomenon – one of exploitation of this underclass of labor.

The situation here I think is very similar to one played out repeatedly through history – unions and strikebreakers. We’ve reached somewhat of a stasis in our labor laws currently which guarantees a certain minimum of ability to organize and a certain base wage. The current system of immigration we have now is one that encourages today’s equivalent of scabs – the enabling of a class of labor not bound to the floor we’ve established as a pre-requisite to participating in our labor force.

Cesar Chavez was notoriously anti-illegal immigration for this reason – in his day, they’d literally bus immigrants across the border to break his labor strikes and then ship them back. Now capital/government has found a better way: let them in illegally, and then pretend our hands are tied to do anything about it. “It’s just too complicated a situation!” or “There are no easy answers to our immigration dilemma!!”

There is an easy answer: open up and streamline legal immigration.

Basically, I don’t get it. Isn’t illegal immigration sort of like a much marger re-hash of Prohibition? The moral authority (however backwards/racist/what have you) says “alcohol is bad” and makes it illegal. Then seeing the logistical futility of enforcement and more importantly, the lost potential tax revenue, does a 180. Isn’t this kinda sorta similar? I know taxes are supposed to be a “democrat thing”, and that most opponents to immigration reform are bowing to business interests, which as you aptly pointed out are completely exploitative, but I mean, couldn’t the huge amount of payroll taxes collected be used to subsidize said industries while they transition to be legitimate enterprises? Not to mention medicaid and other taxes which could go towards medical care, schooling etc of unregistered people(to whom these things can not be denied, further burdening “the system”)…

And I really don’t think it’s the mexican guy working 3rd shift hospitality at the Holiday Inn that’s lowering “strong American wages”, it’s the entire factories shipping over to developing (read: exploitable) countries. And every person working in the US is dumping the bulk of their money right back into their local economies.

‘marger’ = larger

I work with ACORN a bit and tend to agree with their position. I think a good focus is to work for the following:

* A path to citizenship for the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States. * Protection for all workers – both native and foreign-born – by upholding fair wages and working conditions for U.S. and immigrant workers and by ending exploitation and abuse of undocumented immigrant labor. * Reunification of families through removal of restrictions and bureaucratic delays. Those who have waited in line should have their admission expedited, and those admitted on work visas should be able to keep their nuclear families in tact. * Restoration of the rule of law and enhancement of security by providing a path to permanent status with effective enforcement.

Kevin BarbieuxJuly 04, 2007 at 14:41 · reply

A market is a market. And when you flood the labor market, you can keep labor costs low. The more the flood, the lower the costs. The Grapes of Wrath showed the effects of that taken to the Nth degree.

Just before we had our big influx of Mexican Nationals into Nashville, I noticed that all the bank ATMs had converted to bilingual. Obviously they knew something was going to happen before it did. No doubt it was a planned event. And the good leaders of our community were certainly poised to take advantage of it.

There are big-guy Republicans and little-guy Republicans. The big-guy Republicans are really the only ones in our country who benefit from a conservative agenda. And yet we have a shit load of little-guy Republicans who don’t benefit personally by anything conservative, yet enjoy living vicariously through the conquests of big-guy Republicans - spouting whatever they’ve heard next from pundits. The little-guys have no idea what tools they are.

Little-guy Republicans say “NO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.” And the Liberal’s knee-jerk reaction is to say, “YES ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.” The Liberals win that contest, and the big-guy Republicans laugh all the way to the bank.

Kate O'July 04, 2007 at 20:38 · reply

I would’ve agreed with you, but you cuss too fucking much.

AnonymousJuly 08, 2007 at 04:32 · reply

Is there a place for guys who are against illegal immigration but who want to open up immigration quotas on a much much much bigger basis? Or are they also racists and xenophobes in the way that you demonize the opposition?

I haven’t “demonized” anyone. “guys who are against illegal immigration but who want to open up immigration” more or less describes me.

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment