stonewall ford

Harold Ford & Lincoln Davis

So, while I was waiting for my server to rebuild, I was wandering downtown and some kids stopped me to give me a flyer: apparently Harold Ford was speaking in a few hours. So, I went down there to check it out. Man, what a tool. I mean, don’t get me wrong – I am gonna vote for the guy. But, honestly, people: for the party that is ostensibly representing a progressive movement in this country, I was not impressed.

First, there’s Lincoln Davis, who introduces Ford by first going off on some sort of awkward, deranged rant about Republican accusations that Democrats “cut and run”. If Democrats had been in charge during [some unpopular war], we would have won, dagnabbit! We wanted to stay and fight! And we all know that Vietnam was Eisenhower’s fault .. or something. Honestly I couldn’t follow it well, because the grasp on history seemed a little tenuous and, well, inconsequential. I think he even mentioned the War of 1812. WTF?

So, anyways, then Ford comes out, and kisses Henry’s ass for a while and then gives a very brief speech. Ford is a very good public speaker – very charismatic, likeable, and well-spoken. It’s too bad a lot of it is wasted on such crap. First of all, he cited Andrew Jackson as the ideal model for the Democratic party several times – i.e., “that’s not the country that Andrew Jackson stood for” (paraphrased) and such. I’m sorry. Did he say “Andrew Jackson”? The same Andrew Jackson that owned slaves? Andrew “Trail of Tears” Jackson? Seriously?

The crowd loved it, though, and applauded wildly. Maybe slavery and genocide are still progressive issues in Tennessee. Or maybe they just didn’t know who Andrew Jackson is.


Comments

newscomaJune 25, 2006 at 13:42 · reply

I think that there is a combination of the two.

Chris, one correction: Congressman Lincoln Davis, not Senator Douglas Henry, introduced Ford.

.. fixed. Thanks!

Mister NashvilleJune 26, 2006 at 18:51 · reply

So… not to be an ass, but why are you voting for him? I always like to ask that question. :)

Well, in order to avoid the lengthier “two-party system of hegemony sucks, blah blah” type argument, let’s just leave it at this: he’s a Democrat, and he’s a far-cry better than Bryant, Corker, or Hilleary.

Mister NashvilleJune 27, 2006 at 05:40 · reply

Sho nuff. I tend not to argue about anything political. I just always enjoy hearing the reasoning behind each individual’s decision. Not that anyone needed to explain themself…

Kevan SmithJune 29, 2006 at 06:39 · reply

Why the fuck are you putting any sort of credibility and trust in the two party system? Vote absurd and demand proportional representation!

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment