christmas in cambodia

This whole “christmas in cambodia” thing has to be one of the stupidest smear attempts I’ve ever read, and yet another reason why reading instapundit’s partisan buffoonery should be avoided. But since I accidentally did, let me now quote Kevin Drum, who puts this one to bed:

So let me get this straight. Kerry did go to Cambodia – even though that was supposedly impossible, he did take CIA guys in – even though that was supposedly absurd, and he did get a hat from one of them – even though that was supposedly a sign of mental instability. The extent of Kerry’s malfeasance is that instead of doing it in December, he actually did it in January and February.

Considering that he’s mentioned this story only twice, most recently 18 years ago, and it turns out that his only crime is to have tarted it up with a bit of holiday pathos, I think I’ll pass on following it any further down the Swift Vets rabbit hole. But thanks to everyone who displayed their deep unseriousness about this election by participating in this smear. It will be remembered.


Comments

It matters because he’s made “i was in Vietnam” central to his campaign. Even his own team has backed off the claims.

Additionally, it’s important because the brown books and other chicanery issued to suppress the Swifties can be called into question because their first charge (he wasn’t in Cambodia) has turned out to be true.

Now, i think the swifties are some partisans (or at least partisan backed) and should be taken with a grain of salt. But what is more astounding to me has been the Kerry camp’s reactions. Not good for Kerry.

Because he was in Cambodia one month later than he said he was ? Hardly a stop press. Maybe the press will ask where Dubya was when he was supposed to be in the ANG.

We know where dubya was…raising money at the country club (not the Hanoi Hilton, that was McCain, minus the money), working to advance his own political stock, and eating brie while Kerry wolfed C-rations between combat missions.

Combat…or fund raising? Bruised apples or rotten oranges.

One guy went under fire, by choice. One guy stayed home, by choice.

Same old neo-con shit…

Kerry still hasn’t provided one lick of proof he was ever in Cambodia. He has no documents and no witnesses among his band of brothers. Three of his crewmates - Gardner, Wasser, and Medeires - say they never went to Cambodia. Gardner is in the SBVT, but Wasser and Medeires support Kerry, and in fact Medeires was on stage with Kerry at the Democractic National Convention. It’s bad news when those guys won’t back Kerry on the Cambodia story. Again, not one person has stepped forward to say they went to Cambodia with Kerry.

Kerry last repeated his CIA “lucky hat” Cambodia story last year, not 18 years ago. It was in the Washington Post story by Laura Blumenthal last year. Don’t take my word for it. Kerry reproduced the story on his official campaign Web site (it’s at the very end of the story).


A close associate hints: There’s a secret compartment in Kerry’s briefcase. He carries the black attaché everywhere. Asked about it on several occasions, Kerry brushed it aside. Finally, trapped in an interview, he exhaled and clicked open his case.

“Who told you?” he demanded as he reached inside. “My friends don’t know about this.”

The hat was a little mildewy. The green camouflage was fading, the seams fraying.

“My good luck hat,” Kerry said, happy to see it. “Given to me by a CIA guy as we went in for a special mission in Cambodia.”

Kerry put on the hat, pulling the brim over his forehead. His blue button-down shirt and tie clashed with the camouflage. He pointed his finger and raised his thumb, creating an imaginary gun. He looked silly, yet suddenly his campaign message was clear: Citizen-soldier. Linking patriotism to public service. It wasn’t complex after all; it was Kerry.

He smiled and aimed his finger: “Pow.”


Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment