crazy

Oddly, one of the top search queries that brings people to my site is from a post on someone who is crazy, Mike Tyson. (Or IS he?!)

Well, in continuing this fine tradition, I’d like to feature another popular nutbag, Ann Coulter, lying about Max Cleland:

“Cleland lost three limbs in an accident during a routine non-combat mission where he was about to drink beer with friends. He saw a grenade on the ground and picked it up. He could have done that at Fort Dix. … Luckily for Cleland’s political career and current pomposity about Bush, he happened to do it while in Vietnam. …

“Cleland … didn’t ‘give his limbs for his country,’ or leave them ‘on the battlefield.’ There was no bravery involved in dropping a grenade on himself with no enemy troops in sight.”

Needless to say, this would be a low, low attack even if it were true. Of course, it’s not. More on this at The Nation.

You know, I feel the same swell of pity for them both. They both just need some love so badly! Do I see a celebrity hook-up in their future? Mum’s the word!


Comments

The only apparent factual complaint about Coulter’s article is her claim that he lost his limbs in an accident and not combat.

This is factually true, and easy to prove. Cleland has no Purple Hearts. The reason is of course, that they are only granted for in combat injuries (regardless of severity, look at Kerry). Cleland did participate in Khe Sanh and survived unscratched where he won a Silver Star.

Shortly afterwards, he participated in a non-combat mission to setup a radio relay station where when re-boarding the helicoptor after it was complete he spotted a grenade on the ground. The grenade apparently had its pin straightened so that when grasped and closing the handle, it exploded.

Now, you can complain about the lack of respect given to Cleland by Coulter but you cannot complain that her claim is factually false.

*The only apparent factual complaint about Coulter’s article is her claim that he lost his limbs in an accident and not combat.

This is factually true, and easy to prove. Cleland has no Purple Hearts.*

That would be a good point .. if it were true.

True enough, Cleland wasn’t eligible for a purple heart because there was no enemy or enemy fire present.

However:

The mission was not “routine” (Lie #1). Very few missions in Vietnam were routine, and this was no exception: he volunteered to install a radio relay in Khe Sanh.

The mission was not “noncombat” (Lie #1). See above re: Khe Sanh.

He was not “about to drink beer with friends”. (Lie #3) Who knows where she got this one. Did I mention she’s a lying nutbag?

He wasn’t injured by “dropping a grenade on himself” (Lie #4) He picked it up. Coulter tries very hard to make Cleland look like a real dumbass.

So, that’s 4 lies, at least in the very small portion of her column that I pasted.

Nice try, though.. Thanks for playing!

1) “Not routine” or otherwise is going to be purely a judgement call. However, it seems to be an odd definition since radio relay stations are in fact set up routinely. It’s a requirement of their primary function: Relaying radio signals. Furthermore, it was not in Khe Sanh but rather 15 miles away on a mountaintop previously secured by an infantry company. If it had been in Khe Sanh proper it would have been an area filled with plenty of enemy to warrent a Purple Heart. Also, not that it matters, he did not volunteer to setup the relay station, but rather was directly ordered to do so.

2) The mission was quite clearly noncombat, as a Signal team is not a combat team. However, a noncombat mission can quickly turn into a combat mission with the presence of the enemy. Of course, the mountaintop had been previously secured by an infantry team - any combat that occurred was long over before he boarded the helicopter with the equipment. There is a big difference between “combat zone”, which was true, and “combat mission” which was not.

3) Unfortunatley for you, the drinking beer with his friends claim is a quote from Cleland and appears in two papers quoted in Coulter’s second article, including a Boston Globe Sunday article written by Jill Zuckman Aug. 3 1997, and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Dec 5 1999. As well, apparently the beer quote appears in news accounts of the incident for the last 30 years.

4) You’re right he wasn’t injuired by dropping a grenade, and in fact that claim is never made. In fact the exact opposite, the truth, is stated clearly: He saw a grenade on the ground and picked it up.

Because your comments have entirely been based on a truncated version of the article, and inconsistant with the full version, it is apparent that you have only read the Nation response to Coulter, and not her original articles. They are available: http://www.townhall.com/col… http://www.townhall.com/col…

Thanks! Your comment has been submitted and will appear shortly.


Leave a comment